翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Historiographer Royal (England)
・ Historiographic metafiction
・ Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo
・ Historiography
・ Historiography and Historiophoty
・ Historiography and nationalism
・ Historiography in the Soviet Union
・ Historiography of Albania
・ Historiography of Alexander the Great
・ Historiography of Argentina
・ Historiography of early Christianity
・ Historiography of early Islam
・ Historiography of Japan
・ Historiography of Juan Manuel de Rosas
・ Historiography of religion
Historiography of science
・ Historiography of Scotland
・ Historiography of Switzerland
・ Historiography of the British Empire
・ Historiography of the causes of World War I
・ Historiography of the Cold War
・ Historiography of the Crusades
・ Historiography of the fall of the Ottoman Empire
・ Historiography of the fall of the Western Roman Empire
・ Historiography of the French Revolution
・ Historiography of the Gaspee Affair
・ Historiography of the May Revolution
・ Historiography of the Nanking Massacre
・ Historiography of the Poor Laws
・ Historiography of the salon


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Historiography of science : ウィキペディア英語版
Historiography of science
Historiography is the study of the history and methodology of the discipline of history. The historiography of science is thus the study of the history and methodology of the sub-discipline of history, known as the history of science, including its disciplinary aspects and practices (methods, theories, schools) and to the study of its own historical development ("History of History of Science", i.e., the history of the discipline called History of Science).
Since historiographical debates regarding the proper method for the study of the history of science are sometimes difficult to demarcate from historical controversies regarding the very course of science, it is often (and rightly) the case that the early controversies of the latter kind are considered the inception of the sub-discipline. For example, such discussions permeate the historical writings of the great historian and philosopher of science William Whewell. He is thus often (and rightly) viewed as the grandfather of this discipline; other such distinguished grandfathers are Pierre Duhem and Alexandre Koyré.
As to the explicit presentation of the Historiography of Science it is usually dated in the early Sixties of the 20th century. Thus for example, in 1965 we find Gerd Buchdahl reporting "A Revolution in Historiography of Science" referring to the innovative studies of Thomas Kuhn and Joseph Agassi. He suggested that these two writers had inaugurated the sub discipline by distinguishing clearly between the history and the historiography of science, as they argued that historiographical views greatly influence the writing of the history of science.
== The origins of the discipline ==

Though scholars and scientists had been chronicling the results of scientific endeavors for centuries (such as William Whewell's ''History of the Inductive Sciences'' from 1837, and the popular and historical accounts which accompanied the scientific revolution of the 17th century), the development of the distinct academic discipline of the history of science and technology did not occur until the early 20th century, and was intimately bound to the changing role of science during the same time period. The history of science was once exclusively the domain of retired researchers — former scientists whose days in the laboratory had expired but still with a hearty interest in the field — and the rare specialist. However in the decades since the end of World War II the field has evolved into a full academic discipline, with graduate schools, research institutes, public and private patronage, peer-reviewed journals, and professional societies.
Outsiders are often amazed that such a seemingly specialized discipline exists (though just how specialized the subject is depends on how broadly a definition of science and technology one uses). However the study of the history of science has had great effects on the philosophy of science, conceptions of the role of science in society, and scientific policy.
The founding figure of the discipline in the United States was George Sarton, later the founding editor of the journal ''Isis''. Sarton and his family fled Belgium after the German invasion in World War I, and after a brief stay in England, he arrived in the United States penniless and unemployed. Sarton began lecturing part-time at several academic institutions, and in 1916 began a two year appointment at Harvard University. When his appointment did not look like it would be renewed, he appealed to Robert S. Woodward, president of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, for patronage. Woodward gave Sarton a two year position and in 1920 extended it to a permanent tenured appointment as a Research Associate in the Institution's Department of History.
Though modern scholars do not usually share Sarton's motivations — Sarton saw the history of science as the only genuine example of human progress — the tools he left to the field, the journal ''Isis'' and the annual volume ''Osiris'' (both still in print today), provided the foundation of the discipline in the United States.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Historiography of science」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.